Lansing, MI – March 23, 2016 – Despite clear administrative and judicial rulings from 2014 & 2015, declaring PAR to be a “Debt Collection Agency” by definition under Michigan Law, PAR appears undaunted and continues in it’s attempts to thwart any attempt to limit its doing business in the State of Michigan or be defined a debt collection agency under the existing rulings.
1 thought on “The George Badeen vs. PAR War Wages On”
Comments are closed.
Its time for the “Boots on the ground” recovery agencies in Michigan, and the “CORP” to show support for the Badeen case. Historically “Forwarding” is a concept that originated with “Collection Agencies”, now some “bought and paid for” Michigan state senators want to carve out a “new category” beyond the reach of collection regulations. Organize yourselves and educate the consumer advocacy groups to the dangers of entities like PAR, Use the NCLC white paper “Repo Madness” and show the similarities between PAR and Renovo.