Fair Debt Collection Practices Act – FDCPA

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act – FDCPA – The FDCPA provides debtors with a means for challenging payoff demands, and for determining the validity and accuracy of asserted debts. 15 U.S.C. §1692g. Perhaps more importantly, however, the FDCPA establishes ethical guidelines for the collection of consumer debts. Congress targeted such behavior because it found that “[a]busive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal bankruptcies, to marital instability, to the loss of jobs, and to invasions of individual privacy. ” 15 U.S.C. §1692.

Prohibitions on Debt Collector Action

“The FDCPA broadly prohibits a debt collector from using ‘any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt.’ 15 U.S.C. § 1692e.” The statute enumerates several examples of such practices, 15 U.S.C. § 1692e, as well as several examples of unfair practices, 15 U.S.C. § 1692f. The FDCPA also provides, for example, that debt collectors may not harass or annoy debtors, may not threaten debtors with arrest, and may not threaten legal action unless litigation actually is being contemplated. 15 U.S.C. §1692d.

The FDCPA prohibits debt collectors from contacting debtors before 8:00 a.m. or after 9:00 p.m., but it does not prohibit debt collectors from contacting debtors on holidays or weekends unless they know or have reason to know that doing so would be “inconvenient” to the debtor. The FDCPA even gives debtors the right to demand that the third-party debt collector terminate all further communications, but the demand must be in writing. 15 U.S.C. § 1692c.

The FDCPA prohibits third-party debt collectors from contacting a debtor directly if they know the debtor is represented by counsel. 15 U.S.C. § 1692b.

Requirements for Debt Collector Action
Additionally, in their first communication with the consumer, debt collectors are required “to notify debtors about their ability to challenge the validity of a debt and to provide other basic information..” Foti v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc., 424 F.Supp.2d 643, 653 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (citing 15 U.S.C. §1692g). This includes informing the debtor of his or her right to ask the collection agency to “validate” the debt.
Enforcement

In addition to administrative enforcement (15 U.S.C. § 1692l), the FDCPA provides for private rights of action against debt collectors, and permits debtors to recover actual damages, statutory damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs for violations of its terms. 15 U.S.C. § 1692k.

State Application

Preliminarily, the FDCPA generally applies only to third party debt collectors; the statutory scheme was not intended to cover the conduct of the original creditor. However, some states, such as California, have enacted consumer protection statutes that provide broader coverage than the FDCPA, and they may include the conduct of the original creditor within their sweep. The FDCPA permits such state laws. 15 U.S.C. § 1692n.

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act – FDCPA

Related Articles;

Important FDCPA Legal Update

Fair Debt Collection, SCRA, Repossessions, Credit Reporting (and much, much more)

FDCPA UPDATE – Hunstein v. Preferred Collection

Over 100 New FDCPA Lawsuits Filed over 11th Circuit FDCPA Decision Already

11^th Circuit Court of Appeals tosses out the Hunstein decision

11th Circuit Court Ruling Opens an FDCPA Pandora’s Box of Consequences

Over 100 New FDCPA Lawsuits Filed over 11th Circuit FDCPA Decision Already

FDCPA UPDATE – 11th Circuit Court of Appeal Issues Far-Reaching Decision Affecting Third Party Debt Collection Practices

New CFPB Debt Collection Rule

6th Circuit Court Rules Foreclosure Activities During “Dispute Letter” Period Violate the FDCPA