βWe are correcting the last administrationβs attempt to ignore these well-accepted and common-sense principles of our nationβs fair lending laws.β
–
Washington, D.C. β The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Department of Justice (together, the βagenciesβ) announced today that they have withdrawn a joint statement regarding the implications of a creditorβs consideration of an individualβs immigration status under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA).
On October 12, 2023, the agencies published a joint statement cautioning that creditor policies related to an applicantβs immigration or citizenship status could, in certain circumstances, run afoul of ECOAβs and Regulation Bβs prohibition of discrimination on the basis of protected classes, including race and national origin. The agencies withdrew the joint statement to avoid any conflict with the express language of ECOA and its implementing regulation, Regulation B.
βFor decades, ECOA regulations have permitted lenders to consider a borrowerβs lawful residence status and other information necessary to protect their rights and remedies with respect to repayment,β said Acting Director Russell Vought at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. βWe are correcting the last administrationβs attempt to ignore these well-accepted and common-sense principles of our nationβs fair lending laws.β
βThe federal government is committed to avoiding statements that could confuse the law or imply compliance standards for civil rights laws that lack any statutory or regulatory basis,β said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon at the Justice Departmentβs Civil Rights Division. βThis administration is restoring alignment with established federal civil rights law rather than continuing the prior administrationβs ideologically-driven departures.β
ECOA and Regulation B respectively permit creditors to consider pertinent elements of credit-worthiness and information necessary to protect creditor rights and remedies, including a borrowerβs immigration or citizenship status. The agencies also believe withdrawal is appropriate to avoid any confusion that lenders may legitimately consider immigration status under several circumstances, including when necessary to avoid financial risks and to comply with other laws. In addition, withdrawal is appropriate to address any misimpression that the joint statement interprets 42 U.S.C. Β§ 1981 to confer any liability under the statute that has not already been recognized by courts. Finally, the agencies believe withdrawal is appropriate to avoid any unnecessary burdens from new or increased compliance efforts.
Read the Withdrawal of Joint Statement on the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Noncitizen BorrowersΒ
–
Source: CFPB
–
Related:
Biden Admin Threatening Lenders Who Decline Loans to Illegal Immigrants?
CFPB and DOJ Withdraw Joint Statement on Fair Lending and Credit for Noncitizen Borrowers – CFPB and DOJ Withdraw Joint Statement on Fair Lending and Credit for Noncitizen Borrowers – CFPB and DOJ Withdraw Joint Statement on Fair Lending and Credit for Noncitizen Borrowers
CFPB and DOJ Withdraw Joint Statement on Fair Lending and Credit for Noncitizen Borrowers – Credit Union Collections β Credit Union Collectors – Lending – Auto Loan – Department of Justice – Consumer Financial Protection Bureau – CFPB






More Stories
Husband and Wife Face Racketeering Charges in Luxury Vehicle Title Fraud
Fraud is Top-of-Mind for Nearly Nine-in-Ten Auto Dealers
Below Prime Auto Loans β¦ 2025 a Year of Record Highs!