The Auto Finance Paradox

Easier Credit, Less Affordable Cars, and What It Means for Credit Union Lending and Collections

–

The latest auto finance data appears contradictory. On one hand, lenders are approving more borrowers than they have in over a decade. According to Cox Automotive’s Dealertrack Credit Availability Index, credit availability reached its highest level since 2015, driven by increased approvals and greater use of longer-term financing.

On the other hand, vehicle affordability continues to deteriorate. Transaction prices remain elevated, interest rates are still well above historical norms, and many consumers continue carrying negative equity from previous purchases. Meanwhile, the spring surge in wholesale vehicle values has begun to normalize as off-lease supply returns to the market.

Cox Automotive reports that after an unusually strong first half of the year, the wholesale market is settling back into a more typical seasonal pattern.

Individually, each of these trends is noteworthy.

Viewed together, they tell a much more important story, one that credit union lenders and collections professionals should be watching closely.

–

Credit Is Easier. Cars Aren’t More Affordable.

At first glance, increased credit availability sounds like good news.

Historically, easier credit has often accompanied improving economic conditions, stronger employment and healthier consumers.

Today’s environment is different.

Vehicle prices remain near historic highs. Financing costs continue to weigh on monthly payments, and many consumers are still carrying negative equity from previous purchases.

Rather than making vehicles more affordable, the industry has increasingly made the payment more affordable.

Longer loan terms, higher loan-to-value ratios, lower down payments and rolled-in negative equity can reduce a monthly payment without reducing the actual cost of the vehicle. Cox Automotive specifically identifies longer loan terms and persistent negative equity as important contributors to today’s increased credit availability in its latest Dealertrack Credit Availability Index.

The result is a subtle but important shift in risk.

A borrower may comfortably qualify for an 84-month payment while still financing a vehicle that will depreciate much faster than the loan balance declines.

–

The Growing Equity Problem

This shift creates a growing disconnect between the loan and the collateral securing it.

Longer repayment terms naturally slow principal reduction.

Meanwhile, vehicles continue to depreciate based on age, mileage and market conditions. As reflected in the Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index, weakening wholesale values only widen that gap between outstanding loan balances and collateral value.

For credit unions, this creates several risks:

Higher loss severity when loans default.
Larger deficiency balances after repossession.
Greater exposure to negative equity during refinancing.
Increased pressure on borrowers who wish to trade vehicles before their loans mature.

These risks may not appear immediately in delinquency statistics, but they accumulate over the life of the loan.

–

The Return of Wholesale Depreciation

During the spring, tax-refund season temporarily supported used vehicle prices.

That support is now fading.

According to the latest Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index, wholesale values have begun returning to more typical seasonal depreciation as off-lease inventory increases and market supply improves.

For lenders, weakening collateral values reduce recovery proceeds.

For collections departments, they complicate one of the most important decisions in the default process:

When should the lender repossess the vehicle?

–

The Collections Dilemma

Imagine a borrower who falls behind on payments.

Ten years ago, repossession may have been the obvious next step.

Today, many institutions face a more difficult calculation.

If the vehicle’s auction value has declined substantially, repossessing it today may result in:

A larger charge-off.
A higher deficiency balance.
Greater loss severity.
Lower recovery percentages.

As a result, many lenders increasingly look for alternatives before authorizing repossession.

These may include:

Payment extensions.
Loan modifications.
Temporary payment reductions.
Deferrals.
Workout arrangements.

These tools can be valuable when a borrower experiences a temporary hardship.

However, they also postpone the ultimate resolution of the loan.

–

Delaying the Loss Doesn’t Eliminate the Loss

Loan modifications have become an increasingly important servicing tool across the industry.

When used appropriately, they help members recover from temporary financial setbacks while preserving valuable relationships.

But modifications cannot change one fundamental reality.

Vehicles continue to age.

Mileage continues to accumulate.

Mechanical repairs become more frequent.

Wholesale values continue to fluctuate.

Eventually, every lender reaches the same decision point.

Should the institution continue extending the loan, or should it recover the collateral?

That decision becomes more difficult as collateral values weaken.

–

What Credit Unions Should Be Watching

Rather than focusing exclusively on delinquency percentages, credit unions may benefit from monitoring broader indicators of portfolio health, including:

Growth in loan modifications and extensions.
Average loan term at origination.
Negative equity rolled into new loans.
Average loan-to-value ratios.
Recovery rates after repossession.
Loss severity trends.
Changes in wholesale vehicle values.
Time between first delinquency and repossession.

Taken together, these indicators often reveal emerging portfolio stress long before traditional delinquency ratios begin to move.

Credit unions should monitor these internal portfolio metrics alongside external market indicators such as the Dealertrack Credit Availability Index, the Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index, the Federal Reserve’s Consumer Credit (G.19) Report and the NCUA Quarterly Credit Union Data Summary. Viewed together, these indicators often reveal emerging portfolio stress long before delinquency ratios begin to rise.

–

Implications for Collections Departments

Collections professionals are increasingly balancing two competing objectives.

On one side is the desire to help members retain reliable transportation whenever possible.

On the other is the responsibility to protect the credit union from growing collateral risk.

As vehicle values soften, that balance becomes increasingly difficult.

Delaying repossession may improve short-term member outcomes.

It may also increase long-term losses if the collateral continues depreciating faster than the loan balance.

There is no universal answer.

Each account requires careful evaluation based on the borrower’s circumstances, the condition of the collateral and the credit union’s overall risk appetite.

–

Looking Ahead

The current auto finance environment presents an unusual combination of conditions. Credit is becoming easier to obtain. Vehicle affordability remains challenging. Wholesale collateral values are beginning to soften after an exceptionally strong spring market.

Individually, none of these developments is alarming.

Collectively, however, they create what may become one of the defining challenges for auto lenders over the next several years.

For credit unions, success will depend not only on originating quality loans, but also on understanding how changing collateral values, loan structures and collection strategies interact throughout the life of the loan.

The question is no longer simply whether a borrower qualifies today.

It is whether the loan, and the vehicle securing it, will remain financially sustainable three, five or even seven years from now.