Ohio, February 27, 2015 – A recent court decision from the Northern District of Ohio, Vantu v. Echo Recovery, L.L.C., held that a repossession agency, while generally not subject to liability under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, becomes subject to such liability when it undertakes to repossess collateral that it does not have a present right to possess.
This case arises out of a messy situations involving a defaulted auto loan and a botched attempt at repossessing the vehicle securing the loan with the threat of force.






More Stories
Former CU Loan Officer Sentenced for Million-Dollar HELOC Scheme
From Dealership Desks to Racketeering: Another Miami Fraud Ring Busted
CarMax Settles with DOJ Over Illegal Repossessions