Ohio, February 27, 2015 – A recent court decision from the Northern District of Ohio, Vantu v. Echo Recovery, L.L.C., held that a repossession agency, while generally not subject to liability under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, becomes subject to such liability when it undertakes to repossess collateral that it does not have a present right to possess.
This case arises out of a messy situations involving a defaulted auto loan and a botched attempt at repossessing the vehicle securing the loan with the threat of force.






More Stories
NCUA Plans $4.3 Million AI Push to Detect Fraud
Fake Loans and Dead Members’ Accounts: NCUA Bans Two Former Credit Union Employees
CCUCC Honors Industry Leaders at Record-Setting Anaheim Conference
Stupid Stuff Fraudsters Buy: The $250 Million Pool Shark
Ally Keeps Growing as Auto Loan Delinquencies and Losses Edge Higher
When a Car Is Obtained Through Fraud, Is It Counted as Stolen?