Ohio, February 27, 2015 – A recent court decision from the Northern District of Ohio, Vantu v. Echo Recovery, L.L.C., held that a repossession agency, while generally not subject to liability under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, becomes subject to such liability when it undertakes to repossess collateral that it does not have a present right to possess.
This case arises out of a messy situations involving a defaulted auto loan and a botched attempt at repossessing the vehicle securing the loan with the threat of force.






More Stories
Auto Loan Fraud Losses Have Tripled, But the Number of Fraud Cases Is Falling
A Different Kind of Money Laundry
Federal Banking Agencies Issue New Guidance on Immigration-Related Credit Risk
18 Year Old Fraud Auto Loan “Credit Mule” Busted on Video
Lenders Continue Paying Millions to Settle TCPA Lawsuits as Decades-Old Telephone Law Collides with Modern Collections
Happy Birthday CUCollector! Seventeen Years… Where Did the Time Go?